Holy smokes, Sheila, I looked up the rules that allow one to be excused from Jury Duty in South Dakota and they are incredibly restrictive! Not much wiggle room there at all.
California is a bit more liberal in that regard. For example, in California one can be permanently excused/removed from the juror rolls when one is age 70 or above.
In SD it is 80!!!
I agree with Barbie. Leave out the part about the 5th wheel, just say that you are not currently living in SD, but are living hundreds of miles away in Idaho (and have been living there for the last few year/s - be prepared to give some dates, maybe some Idaho receipts - do you have any kind of bills mailed to you there in Idaho? This might be good proof of where you currently live).
Also state that you are there as the sole live-in caregiver for your infirm 97-year-old mother. You also might mention that it would be an extreme financial hardship for you to come, and that you yourself are on oxygen (can you get a doctor's certification to this effect?).
If they give you
any heat, let yourself get all weepy and confused, and wonder out loud how you would be able to change out your oxygen bottle (supply?) several times a day during the course of the trial (that should get their attention).
I live in California, and have served on Jury Duty several times and actually found it interesting each time, although time consuming.
One time I had just brought my infant daughter home, and received a jury summons. I lived in a rural area at that time (my nearest neighbor was about a half mile away) and didn't really know anyone willing or able to care for an infant for what could be an extended period of time. My (now ex) husband was also out of state on an extended business trip. I was alone at home with my baby.
I called the Jury Duty people and explained my situation. They refused me, told me that I could "just get a babysitter" or "let her stay with family" (all of my family was hundreds of miles away) and that I was
required to appear. Or
else.At that time someone in Sacramento (I forget the details) had gone to jail for refusing Jury Duty (I forget the reason). It was kind of a big "to-do" in the local news cycle.
The first time I was called for the initial jury intake, I just brought my daughter with me (I really had no choice).
When I arrived with my daughter I was told that babies and children were NOT allowed, and that my daughter would need to be removed
immediately. Face-to-face now (instead of over the telephone) I again explained my predicament. I was again told, in no uncertain terms, that I could not and would not be excused from Jury Duty for having the responsibility and need to care for my infant child.
I was told, point blank, that if I didn't comply, I would be sent to jail.
This all seemed really strange, and kind of obscene to me, (that the rights of an alleged murderer being prosecuted in a criminal trail, with all of the highly-paid lawyers and clip clap that goes along with it - took precedence over the rights and needs of an innocent mother and her innocent infant). But there you go.
I still think this kind of thing is weird and really messed up. I mean, who, exactly is the criminal, committing a crime here? Sounded to me like the criminal onus was being put on me, the Mom.
I was actually pretty frightened, but (after being silent a bit in order to think things over) I just stared back at the person and said something like, "Well, ok. When you come to arrest me, please have the Foster Care people standing by. I'll alert the media - it should make a good story for the Nightly News". I was
not kidding. I was dead serious. And shaking in my boots.
The person I was speaking to seemed a bit nonplussed, and not a little perplexed. They walked away, spoke to someone else. When they came back I was told that I had been excused.
The entire experience was not at all fun.
Good luck, Sheila. Hope it all works out for you.
Anne