Tina:
Thank you so very much for taking the time to download and read my book.
More appreciated than you may realize. Again,
thank you. Your comments are extremely helpful.
BirdbyBird wrote:Anne, I finally slowed down enough last night to read your book. I did enjoy it and my mind immediately set off wondering what might happen next so you definitely accomplished what I think all good stories do. That said I will admit that I was never completely comfortable with the "voice" or regional patois as you mentioned. My ear kept stumbling over it. II understood your intent and kept asking myself what it would sound like to a nine year old's ear. For me, I just decided that the story would have grabbed my imagination with or without the changes in grammar and the syntax police of my brain would have twitched less. Your question of what educators will consider before recommending the book to students is possibly a real one.
I agree with all of what you say here, and thank you for the truth of it. Particularly what educators might think of it. I may have mentioned in a previous post (I forget) but when I submitted an early draft of "Jones" to a teacher that I knew, this person had much the same reaction as you have here, but was not so nearly polite about it as you are.
The result is that I removed much of the "patois" out of my story - but still made the conscious choice to leave some small amount of it in.
The story, itself, just seemed to want to be written in this particular way.
This is not an argument either for or against, nor is it a defense, but there
is a well-known children's novel (a series of them, actually) written with this device. All of them written by a "famous-ish"
author. As an educator, I suspect you probably know the name of the author I refer to.
HOWEVER! Let me be quick to assure everyone that I
do not consider myself in this person's league.
Not even close. It will never happen! Only . . . to point out that this other story
is "out there", and has been out there for a very long time indeed.
I also acknowledge that "Jones" is aimed towards a younger audience than were these.
BirdbyBird wrote:I do read Young Adult stories but will admit to reading very little in the age range that I am guessing your book is meant to target. When the dogs and I go to the library to listen to the children read, most of the children are kg, 1st and 2nd graders. The books they manage are much simpler. A few older children come with their own chapter books which are longer and more in depth that "Jones." I am thinking "Charlotte's Web", etc. "Jones" seems to fit some area of transition.
I have a few friends with grandchildren of the age I'm thinking my book might prove of interest to. I have given copies of "Jones" to these ladies, hoping they might share them with their grandchildren. This was yesterday, it will probably be many weeks before I hear anything. I do not have any grandchildren of my own, so I don't have (at the moment - I am looking into library-reading possibilities) access to read my story with young children. Without the ability to read it with young children, I can only guess how the story might be received by them. Guessing is not nearly good enough.
BirdbyBird wrote:So in reading the story I found myself wanting more descriptions of specific interactions between the two main characters that would weave a fuller backdrop of the bond that was growing between them. I don't even know if books at this level of "transition" have enough length to them to expect that much.
Hrm. A very valid comment, I think. Would you care to (please) expand on it a bit? What kind of description? What would you like to know about the characters? It would be very helpful to me. I will confess that there was quite a bit more expository material in a previous draft, but I removed much of it, because it seemed (to me) to slow the story down too much.
BirdbyBird wrote:So that is my feedback, given from this both humble and imperfect source with limited experience.
Tina, I find your feedback neither humble nor imperfect, but pretty much spot-on. I also very much doubt that your experience is "limited". No, don't think so.
BirdbyBird wrote:I do so admire both your accomplishments, your determination and your dedication for self reflection and continual evaluation process. The creative process thing is hard work and not for the faint of heart or spirit.
Praise is, of course, the gift of life for a writer, but constructive criticism, acknowledged, is the meat that assures that this life can live on.
I sincerely welcome everyone's comments, both positive and negative. Only by listening to both viewpoints, is an artist able to grow.
Thanks again, Tina. You have truly made my day.
Anne