MandysMom wrote:Well said, and I'll add, here is Sacramento region, we are at 70% of our usual rainfall for thus date in season. Each day that goes by with no rain, that 70% drops a little more, until rain falls. Only a sprinkle or two predicted in next 10 days. I was born in CA and have spent most of my life here, and clearly climate has changed. Anne's comment on usually much rain, might make many of you laugh-- more than 20 or so inches-- per YEAR, is a lot of rain here. If you are anywhere outside the southwest, look up your states annual rainfall.
Velda
Thanks for your post, Velda - most excellent! . . . and thanks for starting this thread.
As you know (and possibly readers not in California might not) annual rainfall totals can be different, in different regions of California. California has many different biomes (as I am sure you know). It is entirely possible (if one likes to drive fast!) to visit one of the highest mountains in the continental United States (Mt. Whitney, in east-central California), the lowest (and hottest) place in the United States (Death Valley), the ocean, and one of the greatest food-producing areas in the world (the Central Valley) -
all in the course of one day!!
Annual average rainfall for the Paradise area is around 58 inches for the year (the actual period we will see rain here generally runs from October to March). October-November-December averages are 18.63 inches for the Paradise area. This year during October-November the total has been about five inches. The jury is still out on December.
I'll get back to everyone on that later.
http://www.intellicast.com/Local/History.aspx?location=USCA0836.
Although I am unable to find exact "to date" rainfall totals for Paradise, I am guessing that the rain that came immediately after the fire totaled around five or maybe six inches. A lot of rain, all at once. Think mudslides in the fire area. And, as of today, it hasn't rained since.
As for how the (er. . .) "weather patterns" have changed here. . . when I first moved to the Northern California Sierra Foothills (in 1976) the first hard freeze - and the rains (with maybe a spot of snow) - would come around mid-September, and we could have rain up until (and including) June. 4th July you would probably need a jacket to go out and watch the fireworks.
And here's a kicker, followed by a curiosity: the foothill area where I moved to was part of the "Gold Rush" area, so the area had been settled for more than a hundred years.
The curiosity of this fact is that many older homes in the foothills at that time (1976) would have an "ice house" out behind to store ice over the summer!! Being a City Girl who grew up in the Los Angeles area, the first time I saw one I didn't know what it was, and had to ask! Most, if not all, of these ice house buildings are gone now - either torn down, or adapted for other uses. One doesn't need an ice house where there is not ice available to harvest due to forty years of changing weather patterns. And where the electric grid has finally arrived.
These days, the lakes in the area no longer freeze even a little bit (actually, not at all - the weather is just not cold enough), let alone freeze thick enough - two feet or more - in order to be able to go out on the frozen lake to cut ice for storage.
This year, the rains that forty years ago came in mid-September finally came at the end of November - two months later. Which means two months more of high temperatures and dried-out vegetation than in the past. Not sure when the rains will stop this year, as I lost my crystal ball
, but if they end this year again in March (forty years ago they might not totally stop until June).
So these days, due to "changing weather patterns", we have a four-month "rainy season" instead of a nine-month "rainy season".
This is
not "speculation" on my part. I, and all northern Californians, are living it.
JudyJB wrote: All of Michigan had been logged by the 1800s, mostly from 1850 to the 1870s. As Anne points out, after the trees were cut, "slash" was left in what had been a gigantic white pine forest throughout the state. . . Consider a forest looking like everyone had been dumping their Christmas trees for a decade.
Anyway, in 1870s through the early 1880s, almost all of Michigan burned, including the entire Thumb in one single fire. Some believe the western part of the state burned from embers flying across Lake Michigan due to the Great Chicago Fire. In other areas, it was due to farmers trying to burn the slash on the forest floor so they could plow it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thumb_Fire
Excellent post, Judy! Thank you. Lots of good information here. The Thumb Fire burned around one million acres, and killed around two-hundred people - all in one day.
As per Wiki:
"The Thumb Fire was the consequence of drought, hurricane-force winds, heat, the after-effects of the Port Huron Fire of 1871, and the ecological damage wrought by the era's logging techniques" This fire is considered one of the worst fires in the history of the United States.
JudyJB wrote: There is such a thing as selective logging, where they go in and take only certain trees, but they still don't remove the brush or the slash they created when they cut the trees down. However, it is a lot more expensive than regular logging, so it is not done as often. So large fires are not new, unfortunately.
The thing about "selective logging" or "selective thinning" that one must keep in mind is this: These "selected" trees are rarely - probably never - just conveniently located along-side a road of (any kind!), where the logger can just back up to the tree and take it down, never leaving the road.
So, not only is slash created around the "selected" tree - slash is also created (and a
lot of it!) as brush and small trees are either cut down or (more likely) bulldozed so as to make a rough dirt track into the forest, in order to get to the location of these "selected trees". Often the route through the brushy understory in order to arrive at these trees can be a mile or more (often more) - which is one of the reasons that make the logging of "selected trees" so expensive.
What happens to these miles of slash that is created in accessing these trees? It is just pushed out of the way, and left to lie where it was pushed to, drying in the sun.
Please read on below for the latest Camp Fire links.
Thanks for reading.
Anne
UPDATE: Death toll from Camp Fire rises to 86
https://www.redding.com/news/Smoke, Wind Hindered Aircraft Fighting Camp Fire, Officials Say
http://www.capradio.org/articles/2018/12/11/smoke-wind-hindered-aircraft-fighting-camp-fire-officials-say/Camp Fire: PG&E confirms damage to tower at blaze’s origin site
Bullet holes, damaged arm found where fire started, utility tells regulators
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/12/11/camp-fire-pge-found-bullet-holes-in-butte-county-power-pole-fallen-hook-other-damage-at-transmission-tower/911 Camp Fire calls reveal confusing and chaotic moments
http://www.ktvu.com/news/911-camp-fire-calls-reveal-confusing-and-chaotic-moments5-year-old Camp Fire survivor surprised with cop cruiser
https://www.kcra.com/article/5-year-old-camp-fire-survivor-surprised-with-police-cruiser-in-roseville/25508130Debris removal for Camp fire could take up to a year
https://www.latimes.com/local/crime/la-me-ln-camp-fire-debris-20181211-story.htmlCamp Fire: Crews begin massive cleanup of hazardous materials left in wake of blaze
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california-wildfires/article/Camp-Fire-Crews-begin-massive-cleanup-of-13451001.php