BirdbyBird wrote:Thank you Anne for sharing so many of the details that get lost in the one liners of the TV news. I have been away from the computer most of the weekend but have been thinking of you and Joe and all the lives affected out west. The links that you have selected to share are invaluable to telling a more competed story and perspective of the on going events. Thank you.
You are most welcome, Tina. Thank you for your post. I know from past fires in my immediate area that the national media doesn't cover disasters in my area as much as they do for disasters in areas of larger population, and thus (perhaps) larger areas of wealth (Butte County, where the Camp Fire is burning, is one of the poorest counties in the state).
For example, few remember the Cascade Fire in Loma Rica October of last year 2017. The Cascade fire burned in Yuba County - also one of the poorest counties in the state.
https://fox40.com/2018/10/03/loma-rica-continues-to-rebuild-a-year-after-cascade-fire/"The Cascade Fire was part of the Wind Complex -- four different fires covering Yuba, Nevada and Butte counties. It made up a little more than half of the complex and was deemed the most destructive. The Cascade Fire killed four people, destroyed 142 homes and burned nearly 10,000 acres."This fire was closer to me than is the Camp Fire (only about 17 miles due east of me, also in the foothills), my home had a lot of smoke from this fire as well. National media coverage of this fire was spotty at best, even [fairly] local television stations did not cover it much. Just too far away, I guess - and it was a relatively "small" fire, as such things go. Only a "few" people killed by the fire. . . Closest tv stations to the fire were between 60 and 100 miles away.
It is important - at least to me - to foster understanding of what those of us on the drought-parched West Coast are facing. The national media will - sometimes - jump in on the story when a fire breaks out - but information as a fire rages on tends to get buried by other stories.
One hears a lot about dry brush and California wildland fires - many parts of Oregon and Washington are in much the same condition, and at nearly - or even exactly - the same amount drought and dried-out vegetation, and thus the same amount of risk. But the media just mostly talks about California.
I have lived in this part of northern California for nearly fifty years. Summers here were once beautiful and warm (and often downright hot) here, with interspersed days of relative coolness (even a few cold days!), even rain sprinkles now and again (especially in June).
For about the last ten years (I can put a number on this because I brought my father to Northern California ten years ago - he is now gone) summer means no rain, unrelenting heat, and smoke-filled skies.
Every summer, almost all summer long. This has far and away been the case for the summer of 2018.
When I first moved to Northern California, our first hard freeze would come about mid-September. Sometimes our first hard freeze these days doesn't come until January.
Karen, maybe you can chime in on this - I'm thinking it must be much the same for you.
We no longer look forward to lazy summer days of picnics in the park, but instead we have smoke-filled skies, smoke hanging in the air, choking smoke smell outside, often with light to heavy ashfall; staying inside with the windows and doors shut, and wondering how many fire fatalities there will be "this time".
Major wildland fires so far,
just this year, in Northern California:
7,579 (some as small as just of a couple of acres, many of tens of thousands of acres, some even of hundreds of thousands of acres):
This from Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_California_wildfires [this is only a partial posting of the information on the Wikipedia site - and this information is
before the current Camp Fire began to burn]
"2018 is the most destructive wildfire season on record in California, with a total of 7,579 fires burning an area of 1,667,855 acres (674,957 ha), the largest amount of burned acreage recorded in a fire season, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)." Lots more information here on the Wikipedia page, too much to re-post here. I encourage those who might be interested to give the page a read. Fire, and smoke from fire, and falling ash from fire, . . . and fatalities from fire. . . is our reality here. Not to many mentions of this in the national media, I don't think.
BirdbyBird wrote:And then I think of how much more of the land is parched and susceptible to continued devastation. It is a matter of chance and a"roll" of the weather dice.
Precisely. And, again, it is not just California - it is much of the west coast.
BarbaraRose wrote:Just unfathomable! Heartbreaking!
I read one story where a woman and her dad watched the fire come closer to their home. The power went out in the early afternoon and they had no way to find out what was going on. They waited until 8pm when their house caught on fire to decide to evacuate. The father ran back into the house to get something and never came back out. The daughter tried to drive away with her two dogs in the car but the tires had melted from the heat. She got out and got into a wet ditch nearby with the dogs and watched the house burn to the ground. My issue is why did they not leave earlier in the day when they had the chance. Why do these people wait until the last second to leave? They were lucky to have had the extra time to pack up and leave before the fire got to them, unlike many others who didn't have that opportunity. I just don't get that...
Good morning, Barbie. Excellent questions. Your post has been on my mind the last several days, as I mulled over how best to answer it.
It is difficult to know why people wait so long to leave. One doesn't know their exact situation - were they new to the area? Were they unaware that they were living in a wildland area prone to wildfire (Paradise also had a "close call" with wildfire in 2008, with fire burning several homes on the outskirts of the city)?
Were they keeping up with local fire news? Perhaps not - electricity and telephone lines were down in the area, almost from the beginning of the Camp Fire - their only option might have been to listen to a battery-powered or car radio if they had one. Many people don't think of their car radio as a source of information - but, on the other hand, radio reception is spotty at best in the foothills - I can attest to that. The only radio I could reliably receive when living in the foothills was satellite radio.
Cell phone service in foothill areas here is generally very spotty to non-existent.
Then there is always a big problem with denial - "it can't/won't happen to me here". And, of course, there has never before been a fire in California - nor in the entire United States - quite like this one. Easy then to perhaps dismiss whatever information they were receiving. Perhaps they believed that the information that they were aware of was exaggerated or alarmist.
Perhaps they just didn't realize that the fire was so close, until it was too late.
As I have written before, I lived in the foothills for nearly thirty years in an area much the same (topographically) as Paradise (Paradise was and is about twenty-five or thirty miles as the crow flies from where I used to live). My home was at around the same elevation as Paradise, surrounded by wildland (summertime dry grass, dry brush, dry trees) similar to Paradise. Extremely strong autumn winds where I lived, just like in Paradise - indeed, these winds are are "normal" for autumn, and blow at this time every year, over most of California, north and south.
The area where I lived had a very scattered population of around five hundred. Paradise has/had around thirty-thousand.
Summers made one extremely cautious (I'm not exaggerating here). The first thing one did when one got up in the morning, and the last thing one did before dark, was to search the sky for smoke (smoke clouds look very different than rain clouds, it is easy to tell the difference). Sometimes, when things were especially hot and dry, one would open the door at night and smell for smoke.
During the day, one always listened for fire-spotting aircraft. Living in a rural area, outdoors was generally pretty quiet - and the engine of a fire-spotting aircraft is thus very distinctive. If one heard the sound of this aircraft, and then went outside and saw one flying overhead, one knew it was time to "get ready".
http://www.fire.ca.gov/communications/downloads/AviationGuide_FINAL_web.pdfIf one heard the ominous, distinctive rumble of a DC-10 (an enormous jet aircraft used to drop fire retardant), or even saw one flying overhead, we knew (without being told) that it was probably time to get the car packed up (photo of DC-10 under link above).
Our main source of fire information when a fire was threatening was the local, all-volunteer, fire station. It was within walking distance, so when fire threatened, we would just walk up there several times a day to see what was going on. A couple of times the parking lot there became a major campground for CalFire.
Radio reception was mostly non-existant, and until the coming of satellite television, we didn't have reliable tv reception either.
One thus learned to "pay attention" to what was going on in our immediate area. Neighbors would inform neighbors.
During those years I was twice under Mandatory Evacuation orders. We packed our cars, but didn't leave either time.
Why not?
First of all, and again, there had never been a fire like the Camp Fire.
Secondly, we had livestock (horses, goats, chickens) that we would need to release out onto the road if we were to go (with limited funds, we did not have a stock trailer, and we did not have a vehicle that could pull one, even if we had such a trailer).
Thirdly, there was not a population density in the area. We lived on the main road, there was little to no traffic going by.
Fourthly, We generally knew where the fire was. One of the mandatory evacuation times, the fire was on the other side of a ridge, to the east of our home. This ridge was fairly close, but completely visible from my living room. I stayed up all night, when the fire was at it's worst, watching the ridge. Had the flames come over the ridge, we would have opened the gates, opened the chicken coop, loaded our dogs, and just driven away. Again, low population density in the area, no traffic on the roads.
I saw flames licking up at the top of the ridge several times during the night, but the flames never came over.
On the other hand, it was always possible for a fire to get started nearer to us, in the middle of the night, when we were sleeping. Had that happened, it might not have been possible for us to escape. The Loma Rica fire happened in the wee hours of the morning, when people were sleeping. This is why people died in that fire.
Knowing now about the Camp Fire, I am not sure we would have stayed. But that was then - this is now.
One of my reasons for moving out of the foothills eight years ago is that I got tired of being afraid all summer long, every summer, of wildfire. Not an overriding reason - but one of the reasons nonetheless.
I still miss, and still grieve for, my wonderful and beautiful foothills home. Probably always will. I had dreamed of living in such a place as a child, ever since growing up in the suburbs of Los Angeles.
But I don't think, especially at my age, that I shall ever go back there.
Death toll from the Camp Fire stands at 80 this morning, with that number expected to increase. Hundreds of individuals still listed as missing and unaccounted for.
As the Camp Fire still burns.
Thank you.
Anne