Azusateach wrote:
People who have weighed in and told her that she can do it inexpensively don't live here. Yes, it can be less expensive if she pays cash for a trailer and tow vehicle. If she does, good for her. But there are still other costs that she can't control.
I get frustrated reading contradictory opinions from folks who don't have a realistic concept of expenses here. I just wish folks would consider what she's trying to do and where she wants to do it.
This is correct. I agree with Azusateach 100%. I live in a semi-rural small town in northern California (Yuba City) and RV storage fees here hover at around $100/125 + mo. In large cities this fee can easily double, or triple - that is,
if a storage facility can be found. San Diego, in southern California - where I think Barbie said she would like to eventually settle - is one of the largest (
and most expensive) cities in the United States. In California, it is only second in size to Los Angeles.
The cost of gasoline is higher in California than anywhere else in the US that I can think of.
There are yearly license fees in California on
both the tow vehicle
and the TT. Think $100/year for a license on a 30-year-old beater trailer (I had one) maybe $200/$300+ year (or more) for a nice, late-model TT. $200+ per year for license on tow vehicle. $50/100
mo. insurance on the TT. $100+/
mo insurance on the tow vehicle.
Etc.
Add everything up, and one can easily end up paying $150 - $200 mo (or more - some places a LOT more) for one's RV rig -
even when it never gets out of the driveway (or out of the storage facility).
This is not counting any payments on a purchase contract of tow vehicle and TT.
Um. . . Think about it. These are VERY good reasons that full-timers
never declare their "residence state" to be California.
One option for Barbie is to (ahem!
) get a van and convert it to a camper. Easily done - all the way from throwing a sleeping bag and an ice chest in the back, up to and including a DIY camper conversion (see my van link below).
And use the van for her primary vehicle.
My van rides better than my Nissan Versa. I am thinking that I don't really need two vehicles anymore, and may sell the Versa.
1. My van gets about 19mpg highway, fully loaded for camping.
2. Insurance on only one vehicle
3. It's not a tent, a trailer or a pop-up. When I get to where I am going, I park it and set up is done.
4. It is hard-sided, I feel safe. A weirdo with a pocket knife isn't gonna slit any tent canvas for a middle-of-the-night surprise
5. License on only one vehicle
6. Decide I need to make a quick get-away (see #4 above). Get out of the sleeping bag, get in the driver's seat - and drive.
Etc.
I have gone on and on about the virtues of van camping in general, and my own van specifically, in previous posts. Not gonna bore everyone here with it all again. If interested, look up the thread.
A van is perfect for
me. Didn't cost an arm and a leg. Doesn't cost an arm and a leg to maintain.
Colliemom wrote: Tires are a one time thing, unless you drive your vehicles to the ground, you only buy a new set of tires probably once depending on how many miles you drive a year. That cost goes with any vehicle. The more yo drive, then you may have to replace again.
Will slightly disagree with Sue - tires are not forever. I replaced my van tires a few months ago, they basically looked fine - but the sidewalls had small cracks in them. After six years in the California sun - Yuba City can, and does, hit 115 degrees F in the summertime - it was time for them to go. Expensive, yes. My van - a converted cargo van - requires truck tires. On the other hand, cheap as compared to a blowout at an high-speed, inopportune moment on the interstate.
Also keep in mind that trailer tires will need to be replaced at some point for the exact same reason.
Barbie, at least consider a van. I think you'll be glad you did.
Anne