by JudyJB » Sat Jul 04, 2020 3:05 pm
Here is my story about the news--In 1967, my then-husband and I went to Europe for the summer and had ordered a new car in Rotterdam from the father of someone we knew. We lived in a northern suburb of Detroit, literally 6 miles north of the soon-to-be-infamous "8 Mile Road" city border. That was the summer of the Detroit riots, if you remember. Well, this was before cable or even much international TV, so we got our news from newspapers, nearly entirely, as did others in Europe.
A lot of people we met would ask us questions about the dangers of Detroit because they had seen photographs in the newspaper or on TV with headlines about the city being "On Fire" or "Burning." In reality, the riots were mostly confined to an area about 4 blocks wide and maybe 12 blocks long. But the maps of Detroit shown by the news had only the mile roads shown, not smaller blocks. And in spots on the maps, there would be graphic flames shown. If you thought those mile roads were blocks, and you did not know how big Detroit and its suburbs were, you would have thought the whole city looked like Berlin during the WWII bombings, which of course is what Europeans still remembered in 1967.
This was made even worse by the fact that the federal government for some strange reason sent in paratroopers to help quell the riots. Of course, they were reserve units and came in on buses, but the Europeans imagined them dropping in from the sky like they had in WWII!! So now we had a city in flames and taken over by an army!!
The person we bought our car from and a lot of people were panicked because they had relatives living in Detroit or the Detroit area. We were constantly reminding people that places like Royal Oak or where we lived were very far from those big flames shown on the news maps!
When we got back home from our 6-week trip, we drove around the city trying to find all the damage we had read about while we were gone. In fact, we had a very hard time finding it. Downtown was almost completely untouched, as were the suburbs. There were occasional burned buildings on a couple of the main streets going into the city, but it was nothing like we expected.
I doubt if the news reporters were really trying to mislead anyone in 1967, but when you print a map and show flame icons on it and do not tell people how big the area is in the map, it is misleading. And you know that guy who is standing in the middle of the wind and rain in the hurricane? He purposely chose the windiest and rainiest place he could find to show how bad things were. Ditto for road damage from high water and tornadoes going through farmland, etc.
The point is that you cannot assume what you see on a TV news program is the way things were all over or typical of what happened. They take photos of the worst and most shocking so they can get their readers to keep watching!! It's called making a living and getting a raise in salary!!